|
Healthcare
economics has changed significantly in the past decade. Health
cost inflation has exceeded double digits and every recipient
of health dollars has experienced substantial changes in payments.
The downward reimbursement trend seems to be disproportionately
affecting smaller providers.
The overall cut in Medicare this year and
elimination of several consult and procedure codes, does not
bode well for most providers of medical services. Recent trends
in healthcare payments suggest that the big players will be
able to better withstand cuts by negotiating better deals with
health plans.
With that premise in place, many providers
are scurrying rapidly to form medical groups by uniting similar
or even dissimilar practices and thereby achieving better leverage.
Whether it is a loose association of disparate medical practices
or a tightly knit organization, it is important to examine issues
that are relevant to group formations. Healthcare laws, antitrust
rules, personnel management issues and business management challenges
are all important to consider.
Health regulators as well as health plans
are aware of the newly popular group practice trend. Care must
be taken while forming loose associations of disparate groups
who refer patients to each other and/or share pricing information
to negotiate better contracts. Regulators will look through
the form of the group and examine substance to determine whether
the arrangement is truly legitimate. Health attorneys must deal
with issues pertaining to Florida Patient Self-Referral Law,
Stark and antitrust laws while advising the group.
True integration brings about a host of benefits
like cost reductions, process synergies and better leverage;
however, challenges do arise from integration and many of them
stem from the loss of control and business autonomy.
Setting Goals
Forming a medical group basically revolves
around some basic goals:
- Negotiate better managed care contracts
- Add ancillary services
- Reduce overhead
- Manage risk
- Offer new services
- Improve healthcare delivery
- Conduct better business modeling
- Protect and preserve assets
Overcoming Challenges
While the advantages are many, group practice
integration comes with its own host of challenges:
- Health Plan Cooperation—Will health plans
actually deliver better rates?
- Credentialing and re-credentialing issues
- Billing changes.
- Malpractice Carriers—Use of “captives”
should be contemplated.
- Banking issues—Guarantees, collateral,
default issues
- Office Space—Lease vs. Buy. What to do
with existing offices?
- Employees—How to achieve synergies? Human
Resource Management.
- Group health insurance plans
- Retirement Plans
- Life and Disability Insurance
- Compensation—Achieving the right balance
between “equality” and “productivity”
The biggest challenge, though, is even beyond
the business issues. It is the ability of multiple CEO’s to
work under one CEO or a management committee. It is the loss
of autonomy that causes most groups to break, and thus it becomes
extremely important to consider exit issues as part of the formation
process.
The ability of a disgruntled shareholder/partner
to leave the group without much hassle is a worthwhile goal
that should be pursued and incorporated into the agreements
at the very outset of the formation process. In addition to
planning exit strategies, care should be taken in designing
governing structures that spell out day-to-day management and
conflict resolution issues.
Finally, using the right professionals in
guiding the formation, operation and closure of group practices
is very important. Attorneys, CPAs, billing companies, banks,
contract consultants, pension advisors, etc. must be brought
in early to ensure that appropriate steps are taken and information
sharing is done in a timely manner.
Amol Nirgudkar, CPA is the managing partner
of Reliance Consulting LLC. He can be reached at (813) 931-7258
or via email at amol@reliancecpa.com
|